I den sevärda franska teveserien Baron Noir (kan ses på HBO Nordic) utspelar sig i säsong 2, 2018, en intressant diskussion mellan republikens president och hennes rådgivare. De båda söker hitta vägar att neutralisera ett terroristhot mot Frankrike och speciellt diskuteras en militär aktion i Syrien:
President: “Option C. I need you to tell me more about it.”
Advisor: “Technically, the position is unchanged. The operation is still feasible.”
President: “Legally, what authorizes us to execute a Daesh soldier in Syria?”
Advisor: “In Syria, it’s a little complicated. Because we rely on an extensive approach to international law and the United Nations Charter. Unlike Russia, which is acting on an appeal for help from Assad, France is compelled to claim it is acting in either collective or individual self-defence. In the case in point, Iraq has asked for help from France. We consider that to be a mandate to act against Islamic State in Syria.”
President: “Our operations in Syria are a direct extension of our operations in Iraq.”
Advisor: “Exactly. The point has never been challenged at the UN.”
President: “And the second possibility?”
Advisor: “Individual self-defence. Being attacked in France by Islamic State fighters gives us the right to kill Islamic State fighters in Syria. But, be careful. Each operation must be thoroughly documented so we can prove the action out there is directly linked to an imminent threat back here.”
President: “I’m afraid Jacques. I’m afraid of not having done everything I could. I’m afraid it will start over. Slaughter. Children. It gets harder every time. The country breaks further apart each time.”
Så inleds professor Olivier Cortens synnerligen angelägna artikel “Methodological Choices and Debates Concerning the Non-Use of Force från 2020”.